Tag Archive for 'Neil Postman'

Page 2 of 2

Tuned in to Buster Friendly

“But what started out as a liberating stream has turned into a deluge of chaos […] It come indiscriminately, directed at no one in particular, disconnected from usefulness; we are glutted with information, drowning in information, have no control over it, don’t know what to do with it.” – Neil Postman (Speech: Informing Ourselves to Death, October 11, 1990)

Watching a news channel with the sound turned off is an exercise in observing the dissonant, repetitious, and yet ever changing visual effects of television. Disconnected from any audio cues, the visuals play like a flickering bulb – a distraction that makes it hard to see things clearly. We see images of people, conflict, disaster; talking heads and hurricanes vying for attention. It gives the impression that the world is in flames, but  information is the fix. Stay tuned.

It is all too easy to become transfixed on television – to become informed without understanding the issues. Many people I know claim to understand the world because they watch the news. They can recite trivia about the Japanese Prime Minister, Britain’s Labor Party, and the United State presidential election. Yet all these things are known in a vacuum. There is neither a contextual scaffold to frame the issues nor is there ever hard analysis about the implications of world events. The news is a cacophonous amalgamation of entertainment, trivia, and the happenings of nations, all occurring all the time, simultaneously. The march of events as seen through the lens of relevance has become an uncoordinated, disorganized gallop, and reporting on events and issues has become a race to disgorge and propagate opinions as well as facts, and often the two have become interchangeable.

The analysis of presidential debates occurs immediately after broadcast, and it seems clear that the talking points were drafted long before the candidates were having their hair done and makeup fixed and practicing in front of a mirror to look the part for the big audition. Becoming someone else is the key to acting. Likewise, critiques of the candidate’s character has become a series of impressions through a splitscreen. Ideas whither after the rhetoric, and we are no longer electing a leader who has a vision, but rather an actor who auditions well for the lead. The news forbids itself for looking too deep, and proclaims understanding and depth for its audience. The commentary of television is a glass ceiling for understanding – at the end of it all, we are still in the fish tank, the outside world obscured by reflections of graphics and stock tickers and news flashes.

How long can this be kept up? How long can attractive news anchors sitting behind desks and staring out with sparkling eyes behind a mask of cosmetics continue to speak the sweet nothings of irrelevance? In doing so, the machine of the news insulates people from the grim realities outside their homes the way a wall keeps a flock of sheep penned in and the wolves out. The wolves are discouraged by the wall, but the sheep are still its’ prisoner. The fear of the wolf deifies the wall as a protector. Such is the credence given to the mass media in the United States. It has become a wall used to align viewpoints of the viewing public – to put the fear of the wolves into the sheep and to keep the wolves at bay through insulation.

We have moved beyond being informed or being misinformed by false information. The television news is no longer about information, it is about worldbuilding; reconstructing a  reality in its own image. An image viewed through bright lights, and talking points, with a new enlightenment coming up after every commercial break. Always after. Do not touch the dial.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • De.lirio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Ma.gnolia
  • email

Greetings from the electron sea

”[F]or it is a certainty that radical technologies create new definitions of old terms, and that this process takes place without our being fully conscious of it. Thus, it is insidious and dangerous, quite different from the process whereby technologies introduce new terms to the language. […] [T]echnology imperiously commandeers our most important terminology. It redefines “freedom,” “truth,” “intelligence,” “fact,” “wisdom,” “memory,” “history,” – all the words we live by. And it does not pause to tell us. And we do not pause to ask.”
 –Neil Postman, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology

As you read, consider the following:

You’ve probably never heard our voices, and yet you read our words in your homes on the east coast of the United States, on the beaches of California, a coffee shop in Baghdad, or on a plane making its way out of Tokyo International Airport. No matter where you are, an opportunity exists for you get receive the information encoded in this text.

Our technology makes all this possible – over thousands of years our capacity to receive and transmit this world building information has grown, and as a species we have hit a watershed of innovation that has yet to slow, and indeed, appears to be speeding up. Today, innovation and creation are measured in months or years, not centuries. Technology has become more complex in the past one hundred years than the previous two thousand. We’ve gone from thinking flight was impossible to landing robots on other planets, from tribe storytellers to international databases, and from pheromones to a billion spoken words broken into visual signals, organised into zeroes and ones, and transmitted across the world.

While these advances represent the amazing ability of Homo sapiens to adapt to our environment, there is also a danger present of using these technologies to stifle the sanctity of the individual. For example, technologies such as trains created to move heavy loads across countries have been used to deliver food to those who are hungry, as well as to move weapons with the intention of doing violence. With industrialization has come both progress and environmental disasters. With every step forward, there are those who seek to move humanity towards a different path – one that is rife with destruction and ultimately, a premature abortion of the dream to live happily in peace.

This is the duality of man – we can be creators and destroyers. We are not rational – nonetheless we have survived, and we are thriving in Darwin’s model. Homo sapiens have outstripped every other species on this planet using our technologies, physical manifestations of our intelligence and our knowledge.  These technologies are used with purpose, whether that purpose is good or evil is dependent on the perspective and the goals of the user. In many ways, this site is about this purpose, and others. For instance:

  • The purpose of our existence and our ability to think
  • The purpose of technology and civilization
  • The purpose of the individual to act as a catalyst for change in the universe

In addition to discussing these questions, our goal  is to outline a way of viewing the world in a proactive and positive manner. As long as there is ignorance and evil pervading our world society, then this message is one that needs to continue to be repeated and reinforced to change the way society shapes the individual consciousness. The alterative is our own destruction. The goal of this book is to provide a philosophical foundation in which the power to change the future is put back in the hands of whom it belongs – each person on this planet. The future does not belong to a person or a government or a majority. It belongs to us all.

As individuals, we have the ability to take control, to steer the ship of our civilization towards the tropical shores of enlightenment, and to learn from the natives we find on her shores. We have already conquered, and nothing positive has come from it. Damaging other ways of life, human or extraterrestrial, has no positive value. With our technology, and, I anticipate, future technologies, we will have the choice to begin the cycle again, or we can break out and evolve into something completely different – a very human, very compassionate race of learners and students, gathering data and using resources wisely. Right now, we have the ability to change culture through individual action. We should change the global culture; beat our swords back into plowshares, and turn our nuclear weapons into clean energy and one person at a time set the world right.

As a global culture, we are racing towards The Brink – whether it is the edge of a wondrous frontier or a plummet towards our own destruction is your choice to make. Our actions make our decisions for us. The path is at our feet.
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • De.lirio.us
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Ma.gnolia
  • email