Comments on: Intelligent Designers: The Evolutionary Landmark http://hardcoredynamic.com/blog/2009/04/08/intelligent-designers-the-evolutionary-landmark/ living on the brink of singularity - where Art meets Activism, Society meets Social, Magick meets Minds, and Stasis becomes Metamorphosis Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:44:03 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: attila http://hardcoredynamic.com/blog/2009/04/08/intelligent-designers-the-evolutionary-landmark/comment-page-1/#comment-1589 attila Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:25:09 +0000 http://hardcoredynamic.com/blog/?p=372#comment-1589 I think you are trying to cover a topic that is way too complex for such a short analysis. There are so many assumptions made to narrow your discourse that I hardly see this as honest logic, but rather an article with an agenda. 1. While natural selection and mild DNA mutation has been proven (witnessed), there is still plenty of discussion in the scientific community about evolution, specifically the Darwinian model. You take the entire debate and minimize it to "Evolution is a scientific fact". 2. In the religious community it is standard argument to say the "God" who created the universe exists outside of it. God, at least in the Abrahamic religions, exists in a non-physical state, and thus is a being completely separate from physical limitation. Not surprisingly, you ignored this completely. The thing is, I doubt you didn't know of this argument, I think you just chose not to address it, again, so that your article could make sense. 3. "suggests a subconscious realization within man that we have indeed become the traditional Abrahamic God" - What does this even mean? How did your argument up to this point warrant this claim even in the slightest? Your "ID" arguments have either pointed to the natural world or alien seeding, yet humans are the gods? and so, I don't think any of this is legitimate. I think you are trying to cover a topic that is way too complex for such a short analysis. There are so many assumptions made to narrow your discourse that I hardly see this as honest logic, but rather an article with an agenda.
1. While natural selection and mild DNA mutation has been proven (witnessed), there is still plenty of discussion in the scientific community about evolution, specifically the Darwinian model. You take the entire debate and minimize it to “Evolution is a scientific fact”.
2. In the religious community it is standard argument to say the “God” who created the universe exists outside of it. God, at least in the Abrahamic religions, exists in a non-physical state, and thus is a being completely separate from physical limitation. Not surprisingly, you ignored this completely. The thing is, I doubt you didn’t know of this argument, I think you just chose not to address it, again, so that your article could make sense.
3. “suggests a subconscious realization within man that we have indeed become the traditional Abrahamic God”
– What does this even mean? How did your argument up to this point warrant this claim even in the slightest? Your “ID” arguments have either pointed to the natural world or alien seeding, yet humans are the gods?

and so, I don’t think any of this is legitimate.

]]> By: Ubermensch http://hardcoredynamic.com/blog/2009/04/08/intelligent-designers-the-evolutionary-landmark/comment-page-1/#comment-250 Ubermensch Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:14:46 +0000 http://hardcoredynamic.com/blog/?p=372#comment-250 Thanks for the tip Jacob. I have updated the site and I hope you choose to return now that its easier on the eyes. Thanks for the tip Jacob. I have updated the site and I hope you choose to return now that its easier on the eyes.

]]> By: Jacob http://hardcoredynamic.com/blog/2009/04/08/intelligent-designers-the-evolutionary-landmark/comment-page-1/#comment-248 Jacob Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:43:07 +0000 http://hardcoredynamic.com/blog/?p=372#comment-248 Your article text is incredibly hard to read. Gray on black is a terrible design choice for readability. Your article text is incredibly hard to read. Gray on black is a terrible design choice for readability.

]]>