Many on the far left and in the fluffy new age croud decry the dominance of western culture across the globe. We hear words like creative destruction, material-rationalism, malthusean crisis, and exploitation bandied about with no context and little critical thought. While these self labeled cultural critics deify non-western cultural beliefs like collectivism, magical thinking, and ludditism, they are oddly silent on polygamy, misygony, and inter-ethnic hate.
Western culture dominates for a simple reason: Progress is dependent on novelty and it is clear that contemporary western culture produces the most novelty when compared to all other global cultural movements throughout human history. As a cultural movement, the west has driven novelty through laissez faire markets in which value (in the form of both tangible goods and intangible ideas) is freely exchanged, and through socioeconomic freedom to ensure a diversity in a set of free minds. Thus novel ideas and discoveries are developed and exchanged, ultimately creating the “fittest species” in the darwinian global marketplace of culture.
However, in recent years the west has moved away from these values of free minds and free markets. The right attempts to impose judeo-christian values under the guise of western culture when it is really the rise of secularism and rational inquiry that has seperated the west from the rest. In this way the right threatens the freedom of minds. The left on the other hand threatens the free markets under the guise of social benefit, when really it is an embrace of free markets that has created the unprecedented wealth and “middle class” affluence first seen in the west. As the right makes its assault on the minds, the left attacks the market, threatening freedom and destroying our cultural potential for novelty and therefore dominance.
We must return to our cultural values at once, or risk seeing our prosperity destroyed. The only way to do this is to once again embrace free minds and free markets and step out of the way of our collective destiny of accelerating consciousness.
What ‘The West’ has taken from outside & then given back to the world culturally & artistically since the Enlightenment is immense. Nowhere is this more apparent nowadays than the popularity of the Western canon of classical music in East Asia.
The legacy of the West, with all its flaws, in these and other ways (political & social) are unassailable, but the world moves on. What develops from this is totally in play. And that is how it should be. To suggest this essntially European influence was dependent on a narrow Friedmanesque laissé faire capitalism is precisely the blinkered thinking that could in time return the West to a peripheral & future cultural Dark Age.
The only ‘Defence of Western Cultural Dominance’, if such a thing were necessary or even desirable, is openness & creativity. Not a circling of conservative cultural wagons.
Whoever wrote this post is not concerned with defending Western culture, but with a futile wish to preserve the US economic & popular cultural predominance of the past 60 years and which
is now in relative decline.
Ubermensch (an interesting psuedonym to choose) should take up the piano or the gazoo and make the best cultural contribution he can, since prose is clearly not his forte.
Very good post. Do you know about US Politics and the elections this year. Also check out about Ron Paul who is the first honest candidate in several decades to be running for Presidential nomination. You can also search in Google or Youtube to know more about him and his ideas. God bless.